Children of the resolution...

I thought I'd write a post about digital images. Now, that might not sound like the most exciting post, but this is about the resolution of images that people receive from their photographer. Resolution might not always make sense, but it is important. I bring it up following a discussion in a photography group, which has thrown up some interesting stories.

Many photographers offer web resolution and print resolution images, either included in your package or they may have the print resolution images as an optional extra. But why have two copies of the same image? What difference does it really make?

Imagine a photographer provides a customer with a screen resolution image. The image dimensions are 25 by 16 inches. The customer tries to print from that, to the same image dimensions. The image comes out looking pixelated.

Now, the customer can actually print from that file, but as it has been saved to a screen resolution, it has fewer pixels per inch than an image saved at print resolution. Traditionally, a screen or web resolution is usually recommended at 72 pixels per inch (ppi) . Printing resolution is usually recommended at 300 ppi. The image has to be reduced in its physical dimensions to achieve a crisp printed image. In this case, the image would need to be reduced to 6x4 inches.

So why do photographers have a difference between "web/screen" and "print" resolution images? Why not just have everything as one image, good enough to print from at the same dimensions you can see on screen?

By reducing the resolution but maintaining the dimensions, this reduces the actual physical file size. So where a print resolution image might be 16MB in file size, it's screen resolution equivalent might be 4MB. That makes the image file smaller, easier to send via email, it's often faster at uploading to file-sharing websites, and on screen, you won't see a difference in quality. It's perfect for things like Facebook or Flickr. Remember too, that most email hosts have a limit on the maximum file attachment size, Hotmail allows 10MB attachments, while Yahoo and Gmail allow 20MB of attachments.

So want to see what it'll all look like? Here's a photo I took recently in Norway. One is saved at screen resolution (72 ppi), the other is saved at print resolution (300 ppi), both have exactly the same physical dimensions.

Now, they both look the same here. But what would it look like if we printed from them at the same size?

Well, a bit like this. The first is how the screen resolution image would look printed. The second, is how the print resolution would look printed. Both at identical physical dimensions. This is shown at actual size.

Admittedly, it looks like I've sampled the top image slightly further to the left, but the physical dimensions are exactly the same.

If we wanted to print from the screen resolution successfully, we'd have to reduce the physical dimensions. This is the size we'd have to reduce it to make it sharp again.

It can all be a little bit confusing. Screen resolution isn't a bad thing, and not receiving print resolution doesn't necessarily mean you can't print from the images. What it does mean is that you would need to reduce the physical size of the image to achieve a good result. So for the imaginary customer to have a nice print that measured 25 by 16 inches, the screen resolution image dimensions would need to be 104 by 66 inches.

If you're in any doubt, it's always worth checking with your photographer about your printing requirements.

Engagement Shoot: Derek and Joanna

Today I'm featuring an engagement shoot I recently did with Joanna and Derek, who are getting married in a few weeks time in Edinburgh and have hired me as their wedding photographer.

I always invite my couples to select somewhere special to them. Derek and Joanna both love Edinburgh, and wanted to use this as the backdrop for their engagement shoot.

At the moment, the city is in the full throes of its annual festival, which brings thousands of tourists, performers, artists, writers and journalists into the capital. Rather than head to the popular Princes Street Gardens, we headed to Saint Andrews Square, with its recently renovated and very cosmopolitan garden. It was a lot quieter here, which made our photo shoot a lot easier.

We then headed to the Guildford Arms, where the couple first met which is also one of their favourite pubs in Edinburgh. As a photo location, it was a great venue. It has a restaurant upstairs with a balcony overlooking the pub, which provided some great opportunities for some birds eye view shots.

Congratulations to Joanna and Derek - I'm looking forward to photographing them some more on their wedding day.

Practically Engaged...

Today's post, I'm writing about the practical side of engagement shoots, things for the couple to consider before they head off to their engagement shoot with their photographer.


Clothes
Whenever I do engagement shoots, I advise couples about clothes to wear on the day.

A lot of the time, we want to instantly jump into wearing whatever we love most, for a photo shoot. However, I advise all my couples against wearing clothes with big logos, text, or graphics on them. The reason I advise against people wearing logos, big text, or graphic images on clothes is that it has two negative effects. Firstly, it instantly draws the eye away from the face in the photograph. Wearing a simple top means it doesn't compete for attention. I think certain patterns are fine, for example, bold checks, but a busy Paisley print, or high contrast fine stripes might not be such a good idea. What you (and your photographer!) also want to avoid, is the moire effect. That occasionally happens when you wear a very fine weave or patterned fabric, and makes it look like there's an optical illusion strapped to your clothes. There are techniques for removing it, but its easier to avoid it altogether. Photoshop has its uses, but its so much faster to get things right before the photo is taken! Nice, plain block colour clothes are great.

The second reason for advising against logos, text, and graphic images, is that it dates the photograph very quickly. Want proof? Look through any old photos you have. Those with text or graphics or a logo might be much more identifiable with a certain fashion at the time, than plain clothes. Plain clothes are much more timeless and classic for professional photographs. It is good to mix up the colour a bit, so a blue shirt with black jeans is fine.

Try to also think about what you're both wearing. Think about coordinating both with colour and style. So for example, if you're both going for crisp shirts, maybe think about the colour - if one wears a black shirt, the other might want to wear a contrasting complementary colour. If one of you wears a pale blue shirt, then a bright magenta pink top might not work so well. When Prince William and Kate Middleton got engaged, their engagement photos showed them both wearing complementary warm neutral coloured long sleeve tops - he wore a mocha brown knitted sweater, and she wore a gorgeous champagne blouse.

You could also think about wearing layers, so that you have different "looks".

But most importantly, wear clothes you feel comfortable in, and that you love. Clothes that make you feel good. If you don't have an outfit that fulfills that "feel good!" factor, then it's a good excuse to go shopping.



Location
You can be as creative as you like with your engagement location. While a wedding budget and availability might curtail options for venues for the actual wedding day, engagement shoots are a chance for you to go somewhere a bit different. You'll probably be thinking of somewhere that you find aesthetically pleasing, making it suitable for photographs. Speak to your photographer about the location. Do be aware though, that not all indoor light is flattering on the face. Indoor venues are fine, but it might be an idea to see if there's a room with lots of natural light, or at least a large window, to give your photographer options.  However, this is all dependent upon the style of photograph you're after. If you want something dramatic, perhaps quite urban and gritty, then strong lighting that casts shadows could look amazing.

From a practical perspective, also consider the location of the shoot. Your photographer may ask you to pay extra travel expenses (and potentially overnight accommodation) if you're wanting to shoot somewhere a bit further than their normal area. Even some photographers who advertise themselves as being "UK wide" may charge extra if you want them to travel to Mull for an engagement shoot when they are based in Leeds.

You also need to consider whether permission is needed in advance. The last thing you want is a member of security escorting you and your photographer off the premises. Railway stations are romantic, for example, but you still need to seek permission in advance as they are private property. Some venues might also ask for a small payment, and you need to consider whether you're willing to pay for your favourite venue. Establish with your photographer in advance who's responsibility it is to attain permission in advance.

Don't worry about asking for permission! I've had to phone lots of venues to ask permission for photo shoots in the past. Most people I've spoken to are helpful, some are even slightly curious (after all, it won't be every day they sit at their desk, working away, and receive a phone call asking them about a photo shoot!), and everyone I've spoken to has been friendly. Phoning is always better than emailing. It is a bit more nerve-wracking, but relax, try to sound cheerful and pleasant and perhaps slightly bubbly (even fake a smile while you talk - they can't see you, but it'll make your voice sound happier!). Emails are fine if you need to follow up with written information with the request. You might also want to make sure you're asking to speak to the office or venue manager, as letting out a big long spiel to the first person who answers might mean you find you have to repeat it all a few minutes later. The worst thing that anyone can say to you is "no", so just relax. Some venues will also have stipulations, for example, no flash (particularly inside historic venues with light-sensitive artifacts); that the photographer has public liability insurance (so the venue won't be sued if a member of the public trips up over a tripod); that you don't expect them to close an area off to the public for your shoot (asking them to do so might involve charges for loss of profit); or they might ask you come early, or late in the day, or during the week when the venue is at its quietest. Timing and insurance are definitely things you want to check with your photographer.


Light
I mentioned light before, but this part is about daylight. A lot of people think that I need strong, bright sunshine to make the most of my photographs. It's not strictly true. I did an engagement shoot recently in the seaside town of Largs, on the west coast of Scotland. We had glorious sunshine, and that was fine, because it suited the location perfectly - seasides and sunshine go well together. However, I also love cloudy days. Cloud can be surprisingly lovely in a photograph. It means the light is softer, there's no harsh shadows, and I can use my own flashes if I want to. I also don't have to worry about whether I'm casting a shadow in my photo, or which direction the sun is in. I like cloud for portraits. From a photography perspective it's the biggest softbox with the most powerful light and it's completely free.


Time
Engagement shoots won't last as long as your entire wedding, but they do take a bit of time. Depending on the location, I usually take a couple of hours. That's longer than I'd expect to take for "private shots of the couple" during a wedding. It's usually a good idea to just block out a morning or afternoon from your diary. People always run a little late; traffic jams, parking, buses not turning up on time, someone calling just the minute you're about to lock the door... things that are often beyond our control can make us all late from time to time. The last thing you want is to be running late and then have to dash away again because you're meeting someone immediately afterwards. 


Props
Finally, let's get onto something a bit more fun! Don't be afraid to talk to your photographer about the idea of using props. You may have some, your photographer may have some. Fake moustaches and chalk boards are very popular props to make an engagement shoot more fun, and add some silliness, frivolity, and playfulness into your images. The benefit with props is it gives you something to hold, you can play around, and a couple being silly together can usually get some fantastic expressions. Don't be afraid of what other people think! Even if you're naturally quiet and reserved, silly playful props can be great. I believe that when you and your partner are old and grey and looking back in years to come, you'll find yourself reliving and giggling about the engagement shoot with the props. If you don't want to be silly, then a small bunch of flowers, balloons, bubbles, a bright umbrella, some colourful wellies can work just as well.

Is there anything you think I've missed from the practical side of engagement shoots? Have you had any personal experience - good or bad - involving the practicalities of engagement shoots? Feel free to let me know using the comments form below!

Engagement shoots

So today, I thought I'd write about engagement shoots. There's two reasons for this: 1. at the time of writing I'm taking a break from editing some engagement shoot photographs; 2. I recently read this article from Smart Bride Boutique listing of reasons why couples ought to take advantage of engagement shoots. So it's definitely something on my mind that I thought would explore it a little further.

I love doing engagement shoots. Engagement shoots are extremely beneficial to both the photographer and the couple for a lot of reasons, but the reason for writing this is perhaps aimed at people who aren’t really sure whether they want an engagement shoot. I think there’s a potential for misunderstandings as to what an engagement shoot involves. I know some people want to “opt out”, but I like to encourage people to reconsider, and this blog entry is about why engagement shoots are a good idea.

Lots of photographers, including myself, offer engagement shoots as part of their complete wedding photography package. Within my package it’s a complementary part of the complete service, and it’s really useful for me when I’m working with a couple.

I think one of the misconceptions is that because you’re hiring a professional photographer the engagement session will be as formal as traditional wedding photography. It’s not. Engagement photo shoots are a slightly different creature. You don’t have to get dressed up, you can wear exactly what you want and unless you’re really into formal poses, most engagement photo shoots tend to be very relaxed and usually shot on location. Actually, engagement shoots offer a wonderful opportunity for a couple to get a little creative with their photographer, do things you really don’t want to do when you’re wearing smart clothes and surrounded by friends and family and have hundreds of other things to think about. It’s about having photos which are about you looking lovely, but also much more every-day. Think of it as lifestyle rather than ceremony. It’s all about exploring your personality outside the wedding environment.

So what are the benefits then? First of all, I encourage my couples to see it as a rehearsal. It gives them a chance to see exactly what its like being in front of my camera, relax, play, and really build up a photographic relationship. It takes away the “what do we do?” factor. It’s a warm up, so that by the time the wedding day comes, my couples feel relaxed, happy and much more confident in front of the camera.

The second benefit is that it’s an opportunity for me to work with my couple, so that we can build on what we produce from the engagement shoot. With their feedback, we know whether we want to do more of a certain thing; or if there’s a pose that they just don’t feel works for them. It’s an opportunity to identify the stronger and weaker images and that can all feed into how we work on the wedding day.

Thirdly, engagement shoots give you an extra photo session, an extra range of professional images you can use.  It makes it a bit more versatile; you have an extra range of photos to use to show people who you are. You can use them as your online profile picture, in print, as a gift for a relative, or for a wedding website for your guests. It also means you’re not waiting until after your wedding before you have lovely photos to show people.

Fourthly, consider the engagement shoot as your pre-wedding treat. When you’re planning your wedding, you spend a lot of money on things that won’t be used or seen until the wedding day. Your daily budget might also be a bit more constrained as a result; you’ve cut back on the luxuries or at perhaps feel a little guilty when you spend when you’re meant to be saving.  The engagement shoot is a chance to be a little more self-indulgent. If it’s included in your wedding photography package, then you can enjoy it without the guilt factor.

Finally, it gives you the chance to have their photograph almost anywhere. Perhaps there’s a stately home with gorgeous grounds that doesn’t cater for weddings but could be used as a backdrop for your engagement session. Maybe you went somewhere on a first date and want to use it for your engagement shoot. I say almost anywhere – remember to factor in traveling distance, and also seeking prior permission from any property owners. 

While I hope this blog entry has perhaps persuaded any engagement shoot sceptics, I'd love to hear from readers on their thoughts and experiences of engagement shoots. Did you have one? If not, do you wish you had?  Or have you got one lined up and how are you feeling about it? Or have you got anything you think ought to be added to this list of reasons why?

 

In my next blog article, I’ll be talking about the practical issues involved in engagement shoots.